Ebola Epidemic! Obama Deploying 3,000 Troops In Africa To Fight Virus! -...

Say No to Boots on the Ground to Combat Ebola Virus in West Africa





Now that we know that AL-Qaeda and ISIS - the greatest evil in the world - were actually created by the CIA and those same Islamic terrorists the US so vociferously has proclaimed to be fighting against are still being supported, armed, and funded by the US sell-out politicians including via their partners in the Middle East (i.e. Israel, Turkey, Jordan, etc.), why should we not suspect the US military using their biological warfare laboratory in Liberia to create and spread Ebola in the first place?



After all, the US military have already proved themselves to be treacherous and psychopathic enough to have done similar evil things to innocent people just for the purpose of creating a pretext for their nefarious plans in the past. If anything, you cannot trust the US military leaders.



Remember the "The Tonkin incident" and the Vietnam War, the Pearl Harbour attack and the broken Japanese codes, the torpedoing of the ocean liner Athenia and the WWII of 1939-1945, the sinking of the ocean liner Lusitania and the WWI of 1914-1918, the “surprise” explosion of the battleship Maine at Havana, Cuba and the Spanish-American war of 1898, the provocative US troop movements near the U.S. southern border caused an incident which led to Mexican wars of 1819, 1846-48? Throughout their history, the US Armed Forces have created numerous false flag attacks in order to justify their overtly unjustifiable schemes. The latest examples have been the attacks on US soil allegedly carried out by Islamic terrorists which led to the US military invasion in Iraq and Afghanistan. The “War on Terror” has turned out to be a sham intended to justify the US military takeover of Iraq and Afghanistan. Only this time, it turned out to be easier said than done.



These days, people do not buy into the US lies about the need of military action in order to stop fictitious unruly warring factions of local warlords any more. Everybody know that those warlords are on the payroll of the CIA and other US intelligence agents throughout the world. Besides, peoples of the world have learned how to protect themselves against such attacks. US military intervention in the affairs of other nations is becoming all too obvious and intolerable these days. That is why the US military leaders have devised another type of false flag attack on innocent people to justify their military takeover and their military presence in other countries. They have decided to use a virus attack as an excuse to interfere into other nations’ home affairs. However, a military takeover in conditions of the outbreak of a regional epidemic is a tricky business that the US troops were not quite familiar with. That is why they needed somewhere to practice before coming to do their usual job of invading foreign lands under a false pretext. Only this time, the pretext would be an epidemic that threatens to become a pandemic. Luckily for the US troops, the target nations were supposed to be far less developed economically and culturally. That is the kind of nation was needed to experiment upon and such a nation was found eventually. It was Haiti.



The 2010 earthquake in Haiti led to a series of tragic events that resulted in a period of complete isolation of the entire nation from the rest of the world by the US military. The US troops simply took over the island under the pretext of a humanitarian operation and cut it off from the rest of the world. No journalists or international observers were allowed into the area that remained totally under US Armed Forces control. What was really going on there at that time? According to European Auditors, relief programs in Haiti were not effectively implemented and could not provide enough care and services to the Haitian people and government. On the contrary, the US troops seemed to do little to combat the spread of infectious diseases among the local population there. Instead, they learned how to secure the land, establish control, and created conditions for subsequent military buildup in the region that is plunged in rapidly spreading epidemic.



The US humanitarian takeover and complete isolation of Haiti in the aftermath of that natural disaster was not intended to help local peoples. The US troops operated in the area where infectious diseases were spreading like wildfire yet little efforts were made to combat the epidemic in Haiti at that time. Rather, the US troops were training to establish direct control of the panic stricken indigenous population and maintain local administrative rule. The ultimate goal is creating conditions for establishing a number of permanent military bases in the region the way it has been done in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Haiti was a testing ground that offered the US government an opportunity for observation, practice and experimentation on such a military takeover and control of foreign territory by way of humanitarian intervention in conditions which govern the outbreak of local epidemics. Establishing large military presence there on short notice and securing the area in such conditions is the end goal. Combating the causes of natural disaster is secondary. Saving the lives of indigenous population is the third priority. This is what is happening in West Africa now.



Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has been erroneously portrayed as someone who would like to vaccinate everybody against Ebola virus. Whereas, in fact he is trying to stop ungrounded panicky speculations about Ebola. According to him, Ebola can be contained pretty easily in the US.



The panic around Ebola is needed to substantiate US and UK government's decisions to send unprecedented numbers of troops and military equipment to Africa allegedly to fight the virus by isolating West African nations. Ebola virus is used as an informational smokescreen and a pretext to occupy West Africa militarily. This will only lead to more deaths from Ebola inAfrican countries not less. It seems, Dr. Fauci prefers to save more lives by vaccinating if necessary more people in Africa rather than to quarantine entire nations there under the direct control of the US and UK military.



“As the epidemic gets more and more formidable and in some cases out of control it is quite conceivable, if not likely, that we may need to deploy the vaccine to the entire country to be able to shut the epidemic down. That is clearly a possibility.” It is not clear to which country in particular Dr. Fauci was referring, though. What is clear is that he prefers to vaccinate the entire countries in Africa rather than simply isolating them from the rest of the world.





There is a trend in the news already suggesting complete isolation of West Africa. Thousands of US and UK troops are going to be stationed in Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea, and any place in Africa where Ebola ostensibly takes hold. It could be the entire continent of Africa. It means complete isolation of that region under direct military control and rule by the US and UK armed forces.



This is what Dr. Fauci said in an interview to Rush Limbaugh: "I wouldn't say it drives me nuts, but it certainly is a distraction at best and very annoying at worst. I always say and my colleagues in the health care and public health sector always say, "Let evidence be the thing that directs your opinion and directs what you do, not just wild speculation." So when

you look at something like completely isolating a country -- don't like any planes in or out, just completely isolate them -- that, in fact, would probably make matters worse because the best way to protect Americans is to suppress the epidemic in West Africa. And if you shut them off from the rest of the world, it's only gonna get much worse there and spread to other African countries".



Rather than plunging the region into the chaos of sectarian fighting and civil wars, the US warmongering leaders have decided to use virus epidemics as a pretext for isolation of and military intervention in the affected nations. Given the current living conditions there, most of African nations are in danger of such a military takeover by the US and UK under a pretext of preventing a pandemic.



It is particularly noteworthy that the presence of US or British troops on the ground in areas where the epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) is ongoing cannot help to stop the spread of the disease there. Historically, epidemics are most effectively being dealt with by specially trained medical experts. Since it is clear, that no US military troops, except for a few specialists, are trained or properly educated to deal with epidemics, there should be no US or UK boots on the ground in West Africa. Isolation and massive military presence will only makes matter worse. That is not how epidemics are treated.



Otherwise, if US and/or UK troops do arrive in West Africa in large numbers and commence building their own facilities, including Camps and Forward Operating Bases (FOB), Contingency Operating Bases (COB), Contingency Operating Sites (COS), Combat Outposts (COP), Patrol Bases (PB), Outposts, Logistic Bases (Log Base), Fire Bases (FB), Convoy Support Centers (CSC), Life Support Areas (LSA) and Joint Security Stations (JSS), such actions should be considered as nothing more or less than establishing a direct military control of the foreign territory in the way it was done in Iraq and Afghanistan. It ought to be considered as an unfriendly and aggressive act on the part of the US government which might lead to regional political and economic instability and, as a number of specialists have already indicated, might result in increased epidemics in the region and more deaths of local people.